Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund (A)

A Word On The Markets  as of Mar 31, 2012

The municipal bond market, as measured by the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index¹⁰, gained 1.75% in the first quarter of 2012. The bulk of that advance came in the first six weeks of the period when an extended "January effect" bolstered the market. Low new bond issuance was met with robust demand, as investors appeared to reinvest both coupons and the proceeds from munis maturing at the end of 2011.

From about mid-February through the end of the quarter, muni returns were muted. Muni yields rose, mirroring similar action in the Treasury market after the Federal Reserve slightly upgraded its view of the economy and Greece's debt restructuring came to an orderly conclusion. These developments, among others, seemed to encourage investors to take on more risk and seek higher-yielding investments outside munis. Demand was further curtailed in March, a historically weaker period for munis, as investors pulled money out of the market ahead of the April tax deadline. An increase in supply also acted as a drag, as new issuance rebounded from relatively anemic levels in March 2011 and refunding (the issuance of new bonds for the purpose of retiring outstanding bond issues) boomed as issuers took advantage of historically low yields to cut their debt costs.

The yield curve, a graphical representation of the yields offered by bonds of various maturities, flattened during the quarter. As such, longer-term bonds slightly outpaced shorter-maturity securities as investors moved out the yield curve - particularly during the "January effect" to capture higher yields. On a total return basis, lower-quality bonds also benefited from demand from yield-hungry investors and outpaced higher-quality bonds as a result.

Performance Summary 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund outperformed its benchmark, the Barclays Capital 1-17 Year Municipal Bond Index², at net asset value, during the quarter.

• Advantageous trading bolstered the Fund's performance relative to its benchmark.
• The Fund's yield-curve positioning was a detractor.
• The credit quality of the Fund's underlying investments had no material impact on performance relative to the benchmark. Furthermore, the Fund remained fully invested in municipals.

Contributors 

With interest rates and spreads so compressed in the short and intermediate-maturity segments of the municipal market, the Fund benefited from management's ability to take advantage of limited trading opportunities.

Detractors 

As for yield curve positioning, the Fund's barbell positioning also detracted. An overweighting in bonds with maturities of 8 to 10 years and underweighting in bonds with maturities of 2 to 5 years hurt as the yield curve steepened from 4 to 10 years. This resulted in the underperformance of 8 to 10 year bonds and outperformance of 2 to 5 year securities.

Investment Outlook And Fund Positioning 

Our outlook for the muni bond market is cautiously optimistic. Credit trends appear to be stabilizing. State and local governments seemed to have gained traction against their structural problems, shedding jobs and enjoying the benefits of rising revenues. Although much more sustained progress on pension reform is needed to address the massive future obligations for pensions and other unfunded liabilities, we believe the municipal market is fundamentally sound. From a technical perspective, we think demand may continue to remain firm, as top earners take steps now to blunt some of the effects of the expected end of the Bush-era tax cuts and the imposition of new taxes, which together will result in sizable tax hikes in 2013. Furthermore, demand likely will be bolstered by reinvestment activity, which tends to be particularly strong during mid-year, as issuers pay coupons, call bonds and pay off maturing bonds along with other factors. Although new issue supply in 2012 may exceed the level of 2011, we do not believe the new issue supply will keep pace with bond redemptions, resulting in net negative supply this year.

The views expressed in this report are those of portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as "forward looking statements". The Fund's actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. While certain U.S. government-sponsored agencies may be chartered or sponsored by acts of Congress, their securities are neither issued nor guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.

No attribution information is available.

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. While certain U.S. government-sponsored agencies may be chartered or sponsored by acts of Congress, their securities are neither issued nor guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.