Advisory Blog
California wildfires rage, muni impacts limited

Timely insights on the issues that matter most to investors.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Eaton Vance are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

  • All Posts
  • More
    Topics
      Authors
      The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

      By Bill Delahunty, CFA, Director of Municipal Research, Eaton Vance Management and Raya McAnern , Senior Municipal Analyst, Eaton Vance Management

      Boston - California is currently battling two devastating wildfires in California. The Camp Fire, located in Butte County (north of Sacramento) has so far burned 135,000 acres, destroyed 7,600 residences and caused 71 fatalities, making it the deadliest wildfire in California's history. The Woolsey Fire is burning in Los Angeles County and Ventura County and has burned 97,620 acres, destroyed 435 structures, caused two fatalities and continues to threaten the suburbs west of Los Angeles.

      These two fires add to a catastrophic wild fire year, as year to date California has experienced 7,726 fires that have affected 1.78 million acres (source = National Interagency Fire Center).

      Extreme weather events are becoming more common, as the number of billion dollar natural disasters has increased from an average of six per year from 1980-2017, to twelve per year over the last five years (source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2018). So far in 2018 the trend is continuing as there have been 11 natural disasters that have each generated over $1 billion in damages.

      However, despite the massive economic losses generated by these natural disasters, according to Moody's, there have been no municipal defaults (by Moody's rated credits) directly related to natural disasters. While the economic losses stemming from these disasters can be immense, most of the economic losses are covered by private insurance or governmental aid, which mutes the impact of natural disasters (mainly through FEMA, which often covers 75% or more of all disaster related costs). Over the last year, Congress has enacted $90BN of supplemental disaster aid.

      While natural disasters have not resulted in municipal defaults in the past, there is no guarantee that this will be the case in the future. If federal disaster relief, or private insurance is diminished in the future, and natural disasters become more frequent, the risks to municipal credit will increase. In fact, S&P recently put the Paradise, CA Redevelopment Agency and the Paradise, CA Unified School District on CreditWatch with negative implications due to the fact that most of the town of Paradise, CA has been destroyed by the Camp Fire. The situation in Paradise will be a true test as to how resilient municipal credit can be in the face of natural disasters.

      Bottom line: Historically, in the wake of natural disasters, any negative impact to municipal credit has been fleeting. We believe that will continue to be true, however, the massive devastation in the town of Paradise, CA will test the resiliency of municipal credit.