Overview

 

Providing tax-exempt income for more than 20 years.1,2

Eaton Vance historically has provided higher income than its peers and comparable Treasury bonds after tax. As of 3/31/2013.

  • Fund
  • Benchmark
  • Lipper General Municipal Debt Category
  • Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Long Index (After-Tax)

Average Annual Returns (%) as of Mar 31, 2013

1 Month 3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
4/30/2013
Fund at NAV 1.74 0.52 2.67 9.56 7.53 5.12 5.25
Fund w/Max Sales Charge -3.09 -4.25 -2.20 4.40 5.79 4.10 4.74
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3 1.10 0.96 1.39 5.19 6.18 6.08 5.05
3/31/2013
Fund at NAV -1.45 0.92 0.92 8.56 7.48 5.78 5.31
Fund w/Max Sales Charge -6.13 -3.86 -3.86 3.42 5.76 4.75 4.79
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3 -0.43 0.29 0.29 5.25 6.22 6.10 5.00
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Max Sales Charge: 4.75%.

Fund Facts as of Apr 30, 2013

Class A Inception 04/05/1994
Performance Inception 12/19/1985
Investment Objective Current tax-exempt income
Total Net Assets of Fund $5.1B
Minimum Investment $1000
Expense Ratio (Gross)4 0.78%
Expense Ratio (Net)5 0.67%
CUSIP 27826L330

Top 10 Holdings (%)6,7 as of Apr 30, 2013

PR Sales Tax Fin Corp Senior (AMBAC)
NYC Wtr Auth W&S Sub
TX Muni Gas Acq & Supply Corp (ML)
North Texas Tollway Auth
GA MEAG BAB Prog M (AL 02/03/44)
Provena Health System, IL - Illinois Fin Auth
CA Stwd Sutter Hlth
New Jersey St Transn Tr Fd Auth
North Tx Toll Converts (AGC)
NYC Ida NY Yankee Stadium (AGC)
Total 14.70


Portfolio Management

Thomas M. Metzold, CFA Managed Fund since 1993

 

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

 

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments. Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Performance

Average Annual Returns (%) as of Mar 31, 2013

1 Month 3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
4/30/2013
Fund at NAV 1.74 0.52 2.67 9.56 7.53 5.12 5.25
Fund w/Max Sales Charge -3.09 -4.25 -2.20 4.40 5.79 4.10 4.74
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3 1.10 0.96 1.39 5.19 6.18 6.08 5.05
3/31/2013
Fund at NAV -1.45 0.92 0.92 8.56 7.48 5.78 5.31
Fund w/Max Sales Charge -6.13 -3.86 -3.86 3.42 5.76 4.75 4.79
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3 -0.43 0.29 0.29 5.25 6.22 6.10 5.00
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Max Sales Charge: 4.75%.

Calendar Year Returns (%)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Fund at NAV 9.09 6.56 7.75 10.17 -2.77 -31.06 39.78 -1.14 11.72 14.22
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3 5.31 4.48 3.51 4.84 3.36 -2.47 12.91 2.38 10.70 6.78

Fund Facts

Expense Ratio (Gross)4 0.78%
Expense Ratio (Net)5 0.67%
Class A Inception 04/05/1994
Performance Inception 12/19/1985
Distribution Frequency Monthly

Yield Information8 as of Apr 30, 2013

Distribution Rate at NAV 4.36%
SEC 30 Day Yield 3.04%


Morningstar™ Ratings as of Apr 30, 2013

Time Period Rating Rating (Load Waived) Funds in
Muni National Long
Category
Overall ** **** 221
3 Years *** ***** 221
5 Years * ** 207
10 Years *** **** 171
Based on Risk-Adjusted Returns.

The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its 3-, 5- and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics.

© 2013 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers is responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. For each fund with at least a three-year history, Morningstar calculates a Morningstar Rating™ based on how a fund ranks on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure against other funds in the same category. This measure takes into account variations in a fund's monthly performance after adjusting for sales loads (except for load-waived A shares) redemption fees, and the risk-free rate, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of funds in each category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. Load-waived A share star ratings do not include any front-end sales load and are intended for those investors who have access to such purchase terms (e.g., plan participants of a defined contribution plan). Not all A share mutual funds for which Morningstar calculates a load-waived A share star rating may actually waive their front-end sales load. Therefore, Morningstar strongly encourages investors to contact their investment professional to determine whether they are eligible to purchase the A share without paying the front load. The Morningstar Rating may differ among share classes of a mutual fund as a result of different sales loads and/or expense structure.

NAV History

Date NAV NAV Change
May 17, 2013 $10.31 $-0.01
May 16, 2013 $10.32 $0.02
May 15, 2013 $10.30 $0.01
May 14, 2013 $10.29 $-0.02
May 13, 2013 $10.31 $-0.01
May 10, 2013 $10.32 $-0.04
May 09, 2013 $10.36 $0.02
May 08, 2013 $10.34 $0.00
May 07, 2013 $10.34 $-0.01
May 06, 2013 $10.35 $-0.03

Distribution History9

Ex-Date Distribution Reinvest NAV
Apr 30, 2013 $0.03774 $10.38
Mar 28, 2013 $0.03835 $10.24
Feb 28, 2013 $0.03717 $10.43
Jan 31, 2013 $0.03933 $10.44
Dec 31, 2012 $0.03813 $10.26
Nov 30, 2012 $0.03813 $10.54
Oct 31, 2012 $0.03861 $10.25
Sep 28, 2012 $0.03800 $10.20
Aug 31, 2012 $0.03834 $10.10
Jul 31, 2012 $0.03908 $10.09
View All
No records in this table indicates that there has not been a distribution greater than .0001 within the past 3 years.
Fund prospectus

Capital Gain History9

Ex-Date Short-Term Long-Term Reinvest NAV
No records in this table indicates that there has not been a capital gain greater than .0001 within the past 3 years.
Fund prospectus

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is as of month-end for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. For the Eaton Vance Fund's performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns shown at NAV unless noted otherwise. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. It is not possible to invest in an index.

 

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments. Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Portfolio

Asset Mix (%)6 as of Apr 30, 2013

State & Muni Bonds 96.93
Cash & Equivalents 3.07
Total 100.00

Portfolio Statistics as of Apr 30, 2013

Number of Holdings 267
Average Yield to Maturity 4.22%
Average Coupon 5.42%
Average Maturity 23.43 yrs.
Average Effective Maturity 11.28 yrs.
Average Duration 9.40 yrs.
Average Call 10.91 yrs.
Average Price $104.15
Total Insured (% of bond holdings) 19.77%
Subject to AMT (% of bond holdings): 16.80%


Sector Breakdown (%)6,10 as of Apr 30, 2013

HealthCare:Acute 11.30
State GO 10.66
Toll Road 7.11
Insured Special Tax 6.57
Airport 5.33
Transportation 5.11
Other Revenue 4.78
Public Power 4.70
Local GO 4.57
Industrial Development Bonds 4.53

Credit Quality (%)11 as of Apr 30, 2013

AAA 7.95
AA 40.94
A 39.13
BBB 7.66
BB 0.00
B 2.13
CCC 0.00
Not Rated 2.20
Total 100.00
Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer’s creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P’s measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by Standard and Poor's or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody's) are considered to be investment grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency's analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer's current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security's market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. Holdings designated as “Not Rated” are not rated by the national rating agencies stated above.


Maturity Distribution (%)11 as of Apr 30, 2013

Less Than 1 Year 0.15
1 To 3 Years 0.01
3 To 5 Years 0.07
5 To 10 Years 2.55
10 To 20 Years 34.69
20 To 30 Years 45.93
More Than 30 Years 16.60
Total 100.00

Portfolio Composition - Muni Bonds11 as of Apr 30, 2013

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 15.60
LEASE RENTAL BONDS/ MUNICIPAL LEASES 3.27
REVENUE BONDS 56.52
Education 3.21
Hospitals/Nursing Homes/ Healthcare 12.08
Housing 1.64
Industrial Dev./Pollution Control/Resource Recovery 4.82
Special Tax 4.24
Transportation 17.55
Utility 8.34
Other 4.64
INSURED BONDS 19.78
ESCROWED BONDS 0.06
OTHER 4.78
Total 100.00


Fund Holdings6,12 as of Mar 31, 2013

Holding Coupon Rate Maturity Date % of Net Assets
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp I 6.25% 12/15/2026 1.77%
New York City Water & Sewer System 5.00% 06/15/2047 1.76%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp 0.00% 08/01/2054 1.75%
North Texas Tollway Authority 5.75% 01/01/2038 1.49%
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia 6.66% 04/01/2057 1.41%
State of Texas 5.00% 04/01/2042 1.37%
Illinois Finance Authority 7.75% 08/15/2034 1.36%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority 5.88% 12/15/2038 1.30%
California Statewide Communities Development Authority 5.25% 11/15/2048 1.29%
North Texas Tollway Authority 0.00% 01/01/2042 1.26%
View All

 

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

 

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments. Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Insights & Analysis

Quarterly Commentary

A Word On The Markets  as of Mar 31, 2013

The municipal bond market, as measured by the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index3, posted a modestly positive return during the first quarter of 2013, gaining 0.29%. This return marked the ninth straight quarterly gain for the muni market.

The Index began the quarter with a gain in January (0.42%). Despite rising Treasury yields, munis rallied after the fiscal cliff deal not only spared the exemption for munis, but also raised taxes on the wealthy—a move expected to fuel continued demand for munis. In February, the Index again posted a slightly positive return (0.30%), as Treasury yields fell amid continued easy monetary policy by the Federal Reserve, the prospect of U.S. government spending cuts resulting from the sequester and renewed concerns about the European debt crisis. In March, a traditionally weak period for munis as investors draw money out of munis to pay for their tax liabilities, the Index lost ground (-0.43%). Demand was further tempered as investors poured more money into equities, and new issue supply increased compared to February. However, munis perked up at the end of March when U.S. bonds attracted safety-minded investors seeking a potential haven due to the Cyprus banking crisis.

For the quarter overall, longer-term bonds outpaced shorter-maturity securities, as investors continued to gravitate toward bonds with higher yields. This comparatively strong demand for longer-term securities resulted in a further flattening of the yield curve13 during the quarter. On a total return basis, lower-quality bonds also were helped by demand from yield-hungry investors and outpaced higher-quality counterparts as a result.

Performance Summary 

Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (the Fund) outperformed its benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index), at net asset value during the quarter

  • The yield curve and credit quality positioning of the Fund’s underlying investments were major contributors to its outperformance relative to the Index. Certain sector selection decisions also benefited the Fund’s performance versus the Index.
  • The Fund’s larger exposure to zero coupon bonds (zeros) also bolstered performance relative to the Index. Additionally, the Fund’s position in Treasury futures contributed to outperformance of the Index, which doesn’t include such derivative instruments.
  • Detracting from the Fund’s performance versus the Index was security selection among high-quality, intermediate-maturity general obligation bonds.

Contributors 

Factors contributing to the Fund’s relative performance compared to the Index during the quarter:

  • In terms of yield curve positioning, the Fund benefited from a larger-than-Index position in 20- to 30-year bonds. During the quarter, these longer-maturity bonds generally outpaced their shorter-term counterparts.
  • The overall credit quality of the Fund’s underlying investments—particularly an overweighting in bonds rated BBB/Baa and below—also contributed to outperformance relative to the Index, as lower-quality securities outperformed bonds with higher credit ratings.
  • In terms of sector weightings, the Fund’s larger-than-Index exposure to industrial development revenue bonds was a plus, as the sector was the best-performing segment of the municipal bond market during the quarter.
  • The Fund’s larger exposure to zeros was beneficial, as zeros were among the better-performing coupon structures in the Index, outpacing many coupon-bearing bonds.
  • The Fund’s exposure to Treasury futures, which are not included in the Index, worked to its advantage, as these derivatives contracts—which were used to manage the Fund’s overall interest rate sensitivity—appreciated more than the Index during the quarter.

Detractors 

Factors detracting from the Fund’s relative performance compared to the Index during the quarter:

  • Security selection among high-quality, intermediate-maturity general obligation bonds detracted from the Fund’s performance versus the Index, as holdings in this segment underperformed similar securities in the Index.

Investment Outlook And Fund Positioning 

Management is cautiously optimistic about the prospects for munis in 2013. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 raised the top marginal tax rates for the wealthiest U.S. taxpayers, making the tax exemption14 afforded to municipal bonds that much more appealing in our view. Additionally, munis were still priced attractively at the end of the first quarter, with the ratio of the 30-year AAA-rated municipal bond yield to U.S. Treasury bond yield at 100%. Investors were essentially getting the tax benefit offered by the highest-quality municipal bonds for free. Furthermore, our view is that there is little support in Washington, D.C. for proposals calling for a cap on munis’ tax exemption, and we don’t foresee an imminent threat to munis’ tax advantages. Against those solid demand trends, we expect the net supply of munis will continue to shrink. Although credit concerns are likely to remain in the headlines in the coming year, we don’t expect a significant uptick in muni defaults. Even so, we believe shareholders would be best served to adjust their expectations, with munis “earning their coupon” in 2013.

Credit Quality (% of bond holdings)11 as of Mar 31, 2013

AAA 12.30
AA 37.00
A 39.15
BBB 7.52
BB 0.00
B 2.10
CCC 0.00
Not Rated 1.92
TOTAL 100.00
Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer’s creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P’s measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by Standard and Poor's or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody's) are considered to be investment grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency's analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer's current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security's market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. Holdings designated as “Not Rated” are not rated by the national rating agencies stated above.


 

The views expressed in this report are those of portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as "forward looking statements". The Fund's actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

 

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments. Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Attribution

 

No attribution information is available.

 

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non–payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments. Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Management

Biography
Thomas M. Metzold, CFA

Thomas M. Metzold, CFA

Vice President, Co-Director of Municipal Investments, Eaton Vance Management
Joined Eaton Vance 1987

Tom Metzold is a vice president of Eaton Vance Management,co-director of Municipal Investments and portfolio manager on Eaton Vance's municipal bond team.

Tom has been in the investment management industry since 1986. He joined Eaton Vance in 1987 as a high yield municipal bond analyst covering the health care and hospital sectors, and became a portfolio manager in 1991. He was formerly a financial analyst at General Electric Company from 1981 to 1986.

Tom earned a B.S. in finance from Siena College in 1980 and an M.B.A. with a concentration in finance from the State University of New York at Albany in 1987. He is a CFA charterholder and is a member of the Boston Security Analysts Society, the CFA Institute, the Boston Municipal Analysts Forum and the National Federation of Municipal Analysts.

Tom's commentary has appeared in Barron's, Bloomberg, The Bond Buyer, The Boston Globe, The New York Times, Reuters Financial Report, and The Wall Street Journal, among other publications.

Education
  • B.S. Siena College
  • M.B.A. State University of New York at Albany
Experience
  • Managed Fund since 1993

Fund Literature

Fund Literature

Discover Opportunities in the Income Markets with Eaton Vance.pdf

Income Markets Review.pdf

Income Markets Snapshot.pdf

Holdings-1st or 3rd fiscal quarters-www.sec.gov

Fact Sheet

Think Performance Think Eaton Vance.pdf

How may rising taxes impact your clients

Commentary

Summary Prospectus

Full Prospectus

XBRL

Annual Report

Semi-Annual Report

SAI

Research Brief: Municipal Bond Research: Putting Together the Mosaic


 

Symbol:  

NAV as of  
  0.00%