Overview

Providing high tax-exempt income since 1995.1,2

Eaton Vance historically has provided higher income than its peers and comparable Treasury bonds after tax. As of 09/30/2016.

  • Class A at NAV
  • Benchmark
  • Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Category
  • Barclays U.S. Treasury Long Index (After-Tax)

Historical Returns (%)as of Dec 31, 2016

Annualized
1 Mo. 3 Mos. YTD 1 Yr. 3 Yrs. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs.
Fund at NAV 0.93 -4.57 1.40 1.40 8.07 6.66 3.33
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index3 1.17 -3.62 0.25 0.25 4.13 3.28 4.24
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. Performance less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Total return prior to the commencement of the class reflects returns of another Fund class. Prior returns are adjusted to reflect applicable sales charge (but were not adjusted for other expenses). If adjusted for other expenses, returns would be lower. The share class has no sales charge.

Fund Factsas of Dec 31, 2016

Class I Inception 05/09/2007
Performance Inception 08/07/1995
Investment Objective High current tax-exempt income
Total Net Assets $1.1B
Minimum Investment $250000
Expense Ratio (Gross)4 0.61%
Expense Ratio (Net)4 0.56%
CUSIP 27826M841

Top 10 Holdings (%)5,6as of Nov 30, 2016

Central Texas Turnpike System
County of Miami-Dade FL
State of California
Great Lakes Water Authority Water Supply System Revenue
WestRock Coated Board LLC
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
North Texas Tollway Authority
Loma Linda University Medical Center Obligated Group
City of Chicago IL
City of Chicago IL
Total 12.68

Portfolio Management

Cynthia J. Clemson Managed Fund since 2004

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of nonpayment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher-rated investments. Derivative instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Performance

Historical Returns (%)as of Dec 31, 2016

Annualized
1 Mo. 3 Mos. YTD 1 Yr. 3 Yrs. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs.
Fund at NAV 0.93 -4.57 1.40 1.40 8.07 6.66 3.33
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index3 1.17 -3.62 0.25 0.25 4.13 3.28 4.24
Morningstar™ High Yield Muni Category7 0.65 -5.01 0.90 0.90 6.26 5.15 3.25
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. Performance less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Total return prior to the commencement of the class reflects returns of another Fund class. Prior returns are adjusted to reflect applicable sales charge (but were not adjusted for other expenses). If adjusted for other expenses, returns would be lower. The share class has no sales charge.

Calendar Year Returns (%)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fund at NAV -4.79 -36.83 45.31 2.63 12.04 15.65 -5.44 18.51 5.07 1.40
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index3 3.36 -2.47 12.91 2.38 10.70 6.78 -2.55 9.05 3.30 0.25

Fund Facts

Expense Ratio (Gross)4 0.61%
Expense Ratio (Net)4 0.56%
Class I Inception 05/09/2007
Performance Inception 08/07/1995
Distribution Frequency Monthly

Yield Information8as of Dec 31, 2016

Distribution Rate at NAV 4.19%
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV 7.40%
SEC 30-day Yield 3.42%
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield 6.04%

Morningstar™ Ratingsas of Dec 31, 2016

Time Period Rating Funds in
High Yield Muni
Category
Overall ***** 142
3 Years ***** 142
5 Years ***** 119
10 Years *** 84
The Morningstar Rating™ for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star.

The Overall Morningstar Rating for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.

©2017 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

NAV History

Date NAV NAV Change
Jan 13, 2017 $8.74 $0.00
Jan 12, 2017 $8.74 $0.01
Jan 11, 2017 $8.73 $0.02
Jan 10, 2017 $8.71 $0.01
Jan 09, 2017 $8.70 $0.01
Jan 06, 2017 $8.69 $0.00
Jan 05, 2017 $8.69 $0.02
Jan 04, 2017 $8.67 $0.01
Jan 03, 2017 $8.66 -$0.01
Dec 30, 2016 $8.67 $0.01

Distribution History9

Ex-Date Distribution Reinvest NAV
Dec 30, 2016 $0.03027 $8.67
Nov 30, 2016 $0.03137 $8.62
Oct 31, 2016 $0.02948 $9.03
Sep 30, 2016 $0.02949 $9.18
Aug 31, 2016 $0.03145 $9.26
Jul 29, 2016 $0.03165 $9.26
Jun 30, 2016 $0.03163 $9.29
May 31, 2016 $0.03048 $9.12
Apr 29, 2016 $0.03117 $9.07
Mar 31, 2016 $0.03190 $8.99
View All
No records in this table indicates that there has not been a distribution greater than .0001 within the past 3 years.
Fund prospectus

Capital Gain History9

Ex-Date Short-Term Long-Term Reinvest NAV
No records in this table indicates that there has not been a capital gain greater than .0001 within the past 3 years.
Fund prospectus

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of nonpayment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher-rated investments. Derivative instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Portfolio

Asset Mix (%)5,10as of Nov 30, 2016

Municipal Bonds 99.92
Cash 0.08
Total 100.00

Portfolio Statisticsas of Nov 30, 2016

Number of Holdings 322
Average Coupon 5.29%
Average Maturity 18.22 yrs.
Average Effective Maturity 8.49 yrs.
Average Duration 6.42 yrs.
Average Call 7.32 yrs.
Average Price $102.82
% Subject to AMT 17.08%

Sector Breakdown (%)5as of Nov 30, 2016

Transportation 18.10
Hospital 14.41
Industrial Development Revenue 11.05
General Obligations 9.73
Senior Living/Life Care 7.03
Insured-Transportation 5.64
Other Revenue 5.40
Special Tax Revenue 4.53
Electric Utilities 3.58
Education 2.90
View All

Credit Quality (%)11as of Nov 30, 2016

AAA 2.29
AA 23.69
A 20.19
BBB 32.81
BB 8.83
B 2.29
CCC or Lower 0.90
Not Rated 9.00
Total 100.00
Ratings are based on Moody's, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. If securities are rated differently by the ratings agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer's creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P's measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody's) are considered to be investment-grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the ratings agency's analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer's current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security's market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. Holdings designated as "Not Rated" are not rated by the national ratings agencies stated above.

Maturity Distribution (%)11as of Nov 30, 2016

Less Than 1 Year 2.83
1 To 3 Years 2.84
3 To 5 Years 0.55
5 To 10 Years 6.05
10 To 20 Years 43.04
20 To 30 Years 41.60
More Than 30 Years 3.09
Total 100.00

Assets by State (%)11,12as of Nov 30, 2016

Texas 19.19
Illinois 10.71
New York 9.67
Florida 8.68
California 8.12
New Jersey 8.03
Michigan 4.31
Pennsylvania 2.83
Colorado 2.65
Arizona 2.35
View All

Fund Holdings5,13as of Nov 30, 2016

Holding Coupon Rate Maturity Date % of Net Assets
Central Texas Turnpike System 5.00% 08/15/2042 1.63%
County of Miami-Dade FL 0.00% 10/01/2039 1.49%
State of California 5.00% 09/01/2032 1.47%
Great Lakes Water Authority Water Supply System Revenue 5.25% 07/01/2041 1.29%
WestRock Coated Board LLC 4.13% 05/15/2035 1.24%
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia 6.66% 04/01/2057 1.19%
North Texas Tollway Authority 6.20% 01/01/2042 1.12%
Loma Linda University Medical Center Obligated Group 6.00% 12/01/2024 1.12%
City of Chicago IL 7.52% 01/01/2040 1.08%
City of Chicago IL 7.75% 01/01/2042 1.06%
View All

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of nonpayment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher-rated investments. Derivative instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Insights & Analysis

Commentary

A Word On The Markets as of Sep 30, 2016

The U.S. municipal bond market posted modestly negative returns for the third quarter of 2016, with the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index (the Index)3 returning -0.30% for the three-month period. Following 14 consecutive months of positive performance, the Index returned -0.50% in September.

Despite the negative total return, municipal mutual fund flows were consistently positive throughout the quarter, as investors sought the tax-free income, less risk and diversification benefits of the municipal asset class. In August and September, this strong demand was met with elevated supply, resulting in a somewhat weaker technical environment at quarter-end. As of the end of the quarter, year-to-date muni bond issuance hit approximately $335 billion, up 4% compared to the same period last year, according to Thomson Reuters. The year-to-date increase in supply was due to a 15% increase in new money deals compared to the same period in 2015, an indication of renewed willingness for issuers to take on new debt to fund infrastructure and other projects.

Due to the unexpected "leave" result of the U.K. Brexit referendum in late June, U.S. Treasury yields began the third quarter near record lows. As the quarter progressed and economic data improved, Treasury market volatility increased amid fresh uncertainty surrounding central bank policies. Short-term Treasury yields rose significantly, while the 30-year yield remained flat. Short- and intermediate-term municipal yields rose in line with Treasurys. However, the 30-year AAA municipal yield rose 29 basis points (bps), significantly underperforming its Treasury counterpart. At quarter-end, the 10-year muni/Treasury ratio stood at 94%, compared to 91% at the beginning of the quarter. Meanwhile, the 30-year ratio ended at 99%, compared to 87% on June 30.

Overall, the municipal yield curve steepened slightly during the quarter, with the two-year AAA muni yield increasing 24bps and the 30-year AAA yield increasing 29bps. Longer-duration muni bonds generally underperformed shorter-duration municipals. In terms of credit quality, below-investment-grade bonds continued to outperform higher-quality, primarily due to strength in Puerto Rico bonds. Surprisingly, Puerto Rico bonds were among the best-performing areas of the muni market despite the default on just over $1.0 billion in debt service on July 1.

Performance Summary 

Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund (the Fund) outperformed its benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index (the Index)3, at net asset value for the quarter.

  • An overweight to and security selection in Illinois credits were contributors to outperformance.
  • An overweight exposure to BBB credits also aided performance relative to the Index.
  • The Fund's use of U.S. Treasury futures contributed to performance for the quarter relative to the Index.
  • Tender option bonds "TOBS" leverage detracted from performance.
  • The Fund also was hurt by an overweight in zero coupon bonds relative to the index.

Historical Returns (%)as of Sep 30, 2016

Annualized
1 Mo. 3 Mos. YTD 1 Yr. 3 Yrs. 5 Yrs. 10 Yrs.
Fund at NAV -0.55 -0.19 6.25 9.34 9.93 8.09 4.04
Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index3 -0.50 -0.30 4.01 5.58 5.53 4.48 4.74
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund's current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) with all distributions reinvested. Returns for other classes of shares offered by the Fund are different. Performance less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Total return prior to the commencement of the class reflects returns of another Fund class. Prior returns are adjusted to reflect applicable sales charge (but were not adjusted for other expenses). If adjusted for other expenses, returns would be lower. The share class has no sales charge.

Fund Factsas of Sep 30, 2016

Class I Inception 05/09/2007
Performance Inception 08/07/1995
Expense Ratio (Gross)4 0.61%
Expense Ratio (Net)4 0.56%

Contributors 

Factors contributing to the Fund's relative performance compared to the Index during the quarter:

  • Security selection in various Illinois credits in the hospital, transportation and general obligation sectors helped performance relative to the index.
  • The Fund's larger exposure to BBB credits aided performance, as they outpaced the Index. Lower-quality bonds generally outperformed higher-quality bonds for the quarter.
  • The Fund's use of U.S. Treasury futures contributed to performance versus the Index. These contracts, used to hedge against rising interest rates, contributed to the fund's relative performance as the value of such protection increased during the quarter. This Index is not hedged.

Detractors 

Factors detracting from the Fund's relative performance compared to the Index during the quarter:

  • Investments in TOBs hurt the Fund's performance versus the Index. These securities act as a financing mechanism allowing investors to borrow at shorter-term rates and invest in higher-yielding bonds. The general rise in interest rates as well as the increasing costs of employing TOB leverage detracted from the Fund's performance.
  • The Fund also was hurt by an overweight in zero coupon bonds relative to the index. Zero coupon bonds, in general, are longer duration holdings, and long duration securities underperformed shorter duration during the quarter.

Investment Outlook And Fund Positioning 

Despite the recent volatility in Treasurys, the municipal market is likely to remain well-supported in the near term, as the intermediate and long end of the curve will likely remain anchored by slow growth, contained inflation and the expectation for low rates worldwide.

Given this outlook, we believe tax-sensitive investors will continue to seek munis as a source of yield and portfolio diversification. Attractive valuations may be another lure, as municipals ended the period cheap relative to Treasurys.

Over the next several months, we will remain highly focused on money market reform, the presidential election and Puerto Rico. Money market reform, which goes into effect in October, has driven short rates higher and we will continue to watch this development for its potential impact on longer-maturity bonds.

In addition, we will monitor the presidential election and the potential for tax reform. And finally, we will closely monitor events in Puerto Rico. With the PROMESA bill signed and the federal oversight board in place, a clearer path toward bankruptcy now exists. However, cash reserves remain very tight and additional defaults in the Commonwealth may be inevitable. If future defaults in Puerto Rico disrupt the broader market, we may consider any price volatility a buying opportunity.14

Credit Quality (%)11as of Sep 30, 2016

AAA 3.86
AA 24.43
A 21.21
BBB 30.38
BB 8.58
B 2.13
CCC or Lower 0.78
Not Rated 8.62
Total 100.00
Ratings are based on Moody's, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. If securities are rated differently by the ratings agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer's creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P's measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody's) are considered to be investment-grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the ratings agency's analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer's current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security's market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. Holdings designated as "Not Rated" are not rated by the national ratings agencies stated above.

The views expressed in this report are those of portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as "forward looking statements". The Fund's actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

The information included herein does not reflect securities deemed to be held by the Fund pursuant to financial accounting standard 140 (FAS 140).

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of nonpayment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher-rated investments. Derivative instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.

Attribution

Attribution available in Fund Literature tab.

Portfolio profile subject to change due to active management. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.

About Risk 

An imbalance in supply and demand in the municipal market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. There generally is limited public information about municipal issuers. As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Longer-term bonds typically are more sensitive to interest-rate changes than shorter-term bonds. Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of nonpayment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer's ability to make principal and interest payments. Investments rated below investment grade (typically referred to as "junk") are generally subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher-rated investments. Derivative instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and/or the Fund could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. No Fund is a complete investment program and you may lose money investing in a Fund. The Fund may engage in other investment practices that may involve additional risks and you should review the Fund prospectus for a complete description.


Management

Biography
Cynthia J. Clemson

Cynthia J. Clemson

Vice President, Co-Director of Municipal Investments, Eaton Vance Management
Joined Eaton Vance 1985

Cynthia Clemson is a vice president of Eaton Vance Management, co-director of municipal investments and portfolio manager on Eaton Vance’s municipal bond team. She is responsible for buy and sell decisions, portfolio construction and risk management for the firm’s municipal bond strategies. Cindy began her career in the investment management industry with Eaton Vance in 1985.

Cindy earned a B.A. from Mount Holyoke College and an MBA from Boston University. She is a member of the Boston Municipal Analysts Forum, the Boston Security Analysts Society, the Municipal Bond Buyer Conference and the National Federation of Municipal Analysts.

Education
  • B.A. Mount Holyoke College
  • M.B.A. Graduate School of Management, Boston University

Experience
  • Managed Fund since 2004


Literature

Literature

Fact Sheet

Download - Last updated: Sep 30, 2016

Commentary

Download - Last updated: Sep 30, 2016

Attribution

Download - Last updated: Dec 31, 2016

Annual Report

Download - Last updated: Jan 31, 2016

Full Prospectus

Download - Last updated: Jun 1, 2016

Holdings-1st or 3rd fiscal quarters-www.sec.gov

Download

SAI

Download - Last updated: Jun 1, 2016

Think Performance Think Eaton Vance

Download - Last updated: Sep 30, 2016

Semi-Annual Report

Download - Last updated: Jul 31, 2016

Summary Prospectus

Download - Last updated: Jun 1, 2016

XBRL

Download - Last updated: Jun 16, 2016