Advisory Blog
What's driving the volatility?

Timely insights on the issues that matter most to investors.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Eaton Vance are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

  • All Posts
  • More
    Topics
      Authors
      The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

      By Kathleen C. Gaffney, CFA, Director of Diversified Fixed Income, Eaton Vance Management

      Boston - December's volatility is a final reminder that 2018 is shaping up much differently than 2017's tranquil markets.

      As we have outlined in recent posts, we think the bond markets are in the midst of an important transition that will require new thinking going forward. Blindly reaching for yield and other strategies that worked well in recent years may be facing a reckoning. The question is whether recent volatility represents a real shift in long-term fundamentals, or is emotionally driven.

      In this post, we'll identify and discuss what we see as the main concerns driving volatility: global growth, tariffs, a flattening yield curve, oil prices and credit spreads. As investors tend to look back at the most recent crisis when volatility picks up, we'll also compare today's scenario to the last growth scare from 2015, and what looks different now.

      China and global growth

      In 2015, the source of worry was China's slowing economy and credit contraction. Fears of a "hard landing" for China dominated the headlines, as the outflow of capital worsened over the course of the year. These fears eventually dissipated, but not before the market contended with months of volatility in equity and income markets.

      Today, the market is grappling with similar concerns about the outlook for global growth. Not unlike 2015, the increase in volatility is viewed as a sign global growth is slowing. In reality, the real economy is doing quite well. Financial markets continue to adjust to a higher cost of capital as liquidity is drained from the system. As we've explained previously, we don't expect this adjustment to be linear.

      What has changed from 2015 is the threat of a trade war. While the tit-for-tat tariff battle between the U.S. and China receives the most attention, we think the real story is about global power and influence. The uncertainty over a trade war and global growth is distracting from the real news, in our view, that there is a technology arms race between China and the U.S. over intellectual property. While China's command-and-control policy gives the country a major long-term advantage, the U.S. wields tremendous leverage in the short term over China with regard to technology.

      This arms race shifted this week after Huawei's chief financial officer (CFO) was arrested in Canada for extradition to the U.S. Prior to the arrest, all eyes were on the outcome of the dinner with President Trump and President Xi at the G-20. It appeared after the dinner that a truce had been declared, though details were vague. Negotiations will now continue until March. However, the Huawei CFO's arrest shows that the rising tensions between China and the U.S. are not going away. The U.S. is taking a tougher stance behind the scenes designed to garner support from its allies and pressure China to make real concessions regarding intellectual property.

      There is a risk that China reacts more aggressively, but its ultimate goal is to be self-sufficient in semiconductor manufacturing by 2025. This is part of Xi's signature plan for 12 industries to be "Made in China by 2025." For now, China is not protesting very loudly. So while the trade war fears may dissipate, the arms race around technology will remain, and we think it will have major implications for both the technology supply chain and the market.

      Signal and noise

      Sorting through the uncertainty and the noise in the headlines, we see signals that have grabbed our attention, and we believe hold the key to better positioning in a volatile market environment:

      1. Ignore the yield curve inversion. It has become a cocktail party topic. We believe the economy is still growing, but moderating as the Federal Reserve continues on a gradual path to raise rates and return the income markets to a normal or neutral level of interest rates. The Fed wants to be gradual but we do not expect a linear march upward. Ample supply driven by the government's financing needs due to the tax cut have momentarily created an inverted yield curve (see below). Technical influences are not fundamental, and we believe a recession at this time is unlikely.

      Blog Image Treas Yield Curve Dec 7

      2. Ignore falling oil prices. OPEC is broken and politics have created a power struggle between the Saudis and Russia. Supply and demand are tighter than the market currently believes.

      3. Don't buy the dip just yet. Credit spreads are widening, but they are only off record lows and are nowhere near average. Some may see a buying opportunity now. We disagree and think investors may want to stay disciplined and focused.

      For example, the technology sector has taken it on the chin. High-priced stocks are falling for myriad of reasons, but one specifically is export controls that the U.S. could put in place more broadly if China does not make some important concessions on intellectual property such as the requirement for foreigners to transfer their technology to China in return for market access.

      In our view, the U.S.-China technology arms race and global trade will affect companies in different ways, much in the way rising interest rates affects companies in different ways. There will be individual credit stories that create investment opportunities in the new environment. By panicking over short-term headlines, investors may miss the idiosyncratic names that stand out in a very volatile market.

      Bottom line: Investors pay a heavy price for short-term reactions to news events when they succumb to the noise of daily up-and-down markets. We believe investors should tune out near-term noise in the markets and instead think differently about where opportunities may be.